Of your 2,982 questionnaires/availableness rules distributed, 497 have been entitled to the research. The fresh impulse price try 16.7% (impulse rates out of outpatient proper care 14.6%, response price off medical facilities 18.1% and you will response speed off nursing homes 16.0%). Given that only n = 29 nurses out of hospitals participated, they certainly were excluded of study data. Immediately following research cleanup, the last quantity of professionals was letter = 437.
Might attributes of your studies populace is actually showed inside the Desk dos. The average chronilogical age of the nurses try 42.8 decades, and you can 388 (89.6%) was ladies. Altogether, 316 nurses responded practical question just how much working go out they spend taking care of palliative patients. 16 (5.1%) nurses advertised expenses almost no time looking after palliative clients, 124 (39.2%) nurses reported ranging from step one% to 10%, 61 (%) nurses claimed anywhere between eleven% so you’re able to 20% and you will 115 (36.4%) nurses stated investing more 20% of their performing time for taking good care of palliative patients. Just as much as one to-third (letter = 121, twenty-seven https://datingranking.net/pl/compatible-partners-recenzja/.7%) of nurses contained in this research failed to address this question. A hundred seventeen (30.5%) nurses said 4 or higher diligent fatalities, 218 (54.9%) advertised step one to three patient deaths and you may 62 (fifteen.6%) said 0 patient deaths during the last month.
Dining table step 3 presents new indicate values and you can important deviations of one’s bills ‘decimal demands’, ‘burnout’, while the financing balances ‘concept of work’ and ‘office commitment’. Every balances attained an acceptable quantity of internal structure.
There’s a powerful positive relationship within ‘decimal demands’ and you may ‘burnout’ scales (roentgen = 0.498, p ? 0.01), and you will a tiny bad relationship anywhere between ‘burnout’ and you will ‘meaning of work’ (roentgen = -0.222, p ? 0.01) and ‘place of work commitment’ (roentgen = -0.240, p ? 0.01). Regarding your basic and you can work-relevant qualities of your own test shown from inside the Desk 2, ‘burnout’ was notably linked to ‘extent regarding palliative care’ (? 20% at the office big date: letter = 199, Meters = , SD = ; > 20% at the office go out: letter = 115, Yards = , SD = , t(312) = -step three.261, p = 0.001). Also, discover a critical impression about your ‘level of patient deaths within the last month’ (F (2, 393) = 5.197, p = 0.006). The new mean of one’s burnout score is lower to have nurses revealing no patient fatalities during the last month compared to nurses revealing five or higher fatalities (n = 62, Meters = , SD = as opposed to n = 116, Yards = , SD = ). There is certainly zero relationship between ‘decimal demands’ and you can an enthusiastic ‘most certification within the palliative care’ (zero degree: letter = 328, M = , SD = ; a lot more qualification: letter = 103, M = , SD = , p = 0.559).
Brand new connection between ‘burnout’ while the analyzed (categorical) funding parameters try shown during the Table 4. Nurses mainly got a lowered value towards the ‘burnout’ size when revealing various resources. Precisely the information ‘family’, ‘religiosity/spirituality’, ‘gratitude off patients’, ‘recognition courtesy clients/relatives’ and you will an enthusiastic ‘even more certification from inside the palliative care’ were not regarding the ‘burnout’.
In total, 16 moderation analyses were conducted. Table 5 presents the results of the moderation analyses where a significant moderation was found. For ‘workplace commitment’, there was a positive and significant association between ‘quantitative demands’ and ‘burnout’ (b = 0.47, SE = 0.051, p < 0.001). An increase of one value on the scale ‘quantitative demands' increased the scale ‘burnout' by 0.47. ‘Workplace commitment' was negatively related to ‘burnout', meaning that a higher degree of ‘workplace commitment' was related to a lower level of ‘burnout' (b = -0.11, SE = 0.048, p = 0.030). A model with the interaction term of ‘quantitative demands' and the resource ‘workplace commitment' accounted for significantly more variance in ‘burnout' than a model without interaction term (?R 2 = 0.021, p = 0.004). The impact of ‘quantitative demands' on ‘burnout' was dependent on ‘workplace commitment' (b = -0.01, SE = 0.002 p = 0.004). The variables explained 31.9% of the variance in ‘burnout'.